AskemosBibliography

Books

H. Baker (Critique of DIN Kernel Lisp definition version 1.2) [unread]

H. Abel, G. Sussman (MIT Press 1985, 0-262-01077-1)

K. Beck (Addison Wesley 199X, 0-201-61641-6)

D. Megginson (Prentice-Hall 1998, 0-13-642299-3)

G. Booch (B/C Inc. 1994, 0-8053-5340-2) and others

G. Kiczales, J. Rivieres (MIT Press 1991, 0-262-61074-4)

L. Bic, A. C. Shaw (Prentice-Hall 1988, 0-13-539776-6)

C. A. R. Hoare "Communicating Sequential Processes" (Prentice Hall 1985, )

N. Petkov (Akademie Verlag Berlin 1989, 3-05-500661-5)

A. Zell (Addison Wesley 1994/96, 3-89319-554-8)

R. Wobst (Addison Wesley 1997, 3-8273-1193-4)

A. Oberweis (Teubner 1996, 3-8154-2600-6)

K. Füssel (Münster 1983 3-923792-00-X)

D. R. Hofstadter (1979 [also 3-608-93037-X])

J. Locke;

U. Eco 1977

I. Kant "Kritik der reinen Vernunft"

K. L. Reinhold 1790

Minsky, Marvin Lee "A framework for representing knowledge." 1975 In Winston, Patrick Henry (Hg.): The psychology of computer vision. New York et al.: McGraw-Hill. 211-277.

Related Projects

generally related

funnel / functional nets: [dead on lampwww.epfl.ch/fu/ in 2008] Same combination of key ideas of Functional Programming and Petri-Nets to yield a simple and general programming notation.
tunes: TUNES has Very simillar in design goals. Active in June 2002
Jitrix: [dead 2008] http://www.jtrix.org/ Probably the second most simillar projects on the way. Needs investigation.
transmorpher: http://transmorpher.inrialpes.fr/Somehowsimilar for chained xml transformations. (needs evaluation)
ohs [dead 2008]: http://www.bootstrap.org/ohs/ Open hyperdocument system, sound as if it exposed the same structure towards the user, doesn't it?
openprivacy.org: http://openprivacy.org/ A lot of design work to draw from. Aparently less code? At least not to find -- and apparently unchanged since 2001 (by 2008).
Oxygen: http://www.oxygen.lcs.mit.edu Similar goals in the long run. Much larger scope.
ftsh: http://www.cse.nd.edu/~ccl/software/ftsh/ a fault tollerant shell
FramerD: FramerD ( http://www.framerd.org ) similar analytical goals; has been tried in a prototype and proved a structural match (not hierarchical). Development state too much alpha, moving target, too slow.

some minor similarities

These are merly related due to their implementation details, not so much by design.

CDuse?: http://www.cduce.org/ Another functional programming language with xml types.
xpipe: http://xpipe.sourceforge.net/ [2002] another execution environment for xml processing
Rhizome: http://rhizome.liminalzone.org/ . Quitesimilar in int's aim. Main advantage: rhizome already deploys dedicated syntax for xml editing (zml) and apache forrest. Main disadvantage askemos already runs as a p2p network.
webit!: http://celtic.benderweb.net/webit/ a XSLT|SVG and others framework, which might contain useful bits to complete the XSLT implementation in Askemos
BRL: BRL is a java servlet / scheme server bearing minor similarities
sisc/web: another Scheme based web programming environment http://siscweb.sourceforge.net/
Cocoon: ApacheCocoon has same script programming language, simillar processing model
Zope: http://www.zope.org an application server, which almost became the code base but it has structural issues which made that infeasible.
xmlblaster: http://www.xmlblaster.org similar model, somehow boring
laml: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~normark/laml/ Also scheme based and used in html creation.
Tiki: http://tikiwiki.sourceforge.net/ Taken as a black box, Tiki is a simillar workflow engine. There's a lot of user interface ideas to draw from. (The implementation is PHP, far from byzantine synchronization.)

still related but...

xns: http://www.xns.org Some design work and promotion. In June 2002 no apparent development since two years.
one.world: http://one.cs.washington.edu/tutorial/counter.html Looks somehow simillar. Lot's of pointers. I need some time to look into (which I'm not gonna have soon) and I would not want to write that much code just for a counter. ;-)
<bigwig>: http://www.brics.dk/bigwig/ similar for web programming (judged from first web page) except that it defines a proprietary language, which might be useful.